Bid-Writing / Grant Applications
Biddit
Write better bids, faster, in your own voice.
What Biddit does
-
AI drafting in your organisation's voice
Per-question Draft / Improve / Rewrite, steered by a three-layer prompt stack: a workspace style guide, a per-bid project prompt, and per-question guidance — so it isn't a generic chatbot.
-
Template & question-bank builder
Build a funder's application form as Sections → Questions → Fields, with four guidance tabs per question (funder prompt, writer guidance, director's tips, hidden AI prompt) and word/character limits.
-
Bid pipeline dashboard
A filterable list or grid of every bid by status, funder, template, or writer, with stat tiles for Active Bids, Due This Month, Submitted, and Needs Attention — and a slide-over inspector to edit without leaving the list.
-
Client Survey + Bid Preview
Send a public intake form to your funding client to collect background, and share a read-only preview of the draft for comment — both without anyone needing a login.
-
Full version history
Autosave plus named 'save version' checkpoints; any past version can be previewed read-only or restored, so nobody's afraid to let the AI take a real swing at a paragraph.
Reference library for AI context
An organisation-level store of project and background documents, tagged and scoped, that the AI can draw on when drafting a specific question — separate from the bid answers themselves.
Draft → Critic → Repair loop
For multi-field questions, the AI's output is automatically checked against word and character limits and retried until it complies.
Bid-level roles
Assign a lead, reviewer, or view-only person on an individual bid, separately from their organisation-wide role — useful for looping in a trustee or specialist reviewer on just one application.
Who it's for
Nadia, the fundraising officer at a mid-size dance company, is juggling six live applications a year to Arts Council England, two trusts, and a local authority fund. She needs the AI to sound like her organisation, and she needs to know at a glance which application is closest to its deadline.
How it works
- 1
Set up a template from a funder's form
Build the sections, questions, and fields matching the funder's actual application, with word/character limits and internal guidance per question → publish it → reuse it every time that funder opens a round.
- 2
Draft a bid
Create a bid from the template → use Draft/Improve/Rewrite on each question, drawing on your style guide and reference files → save named version checkpoints as it develops → move the bid through the status pipeline as it's reviewed.
- 3
Collect client input and get it reviewed
Send the public Client Survey link to gather background details → those answers feed into the bid → share a Bid Preview link with the client or board for comment before you submit.
Why not just use Google Docs and a shared drive?
Google Docs is free and genuinely fine for a single writer working on a single bid. It falls short once an organisation is running several applications in parallel: nothing reuses between bids, nobody's tracking which of six live applications is about to blow its deadline, and there's no structured field-level guidance or organisation-tuned AI help. If you're only submitting one or two bids a year, Google Docs is enough — Biddit's value shows up once you're juggling several at once and want consistent AI-assisted drafting in your own voice.
£10/mo
or £100/year
Also in the Touchgrass Sweet — all four paid apps together, with Compass free.
What people say
“Six live funding applications used to mean six slightly different voices. Now they all sound like us.”